Impact of implementing a computerised quality improvement intervention in primary healthcare

Health systems worldwide experience large evidence practice gaps with underuse of proven therapies, overuse of inappropriate treatments and misuse of treatments due to medical error. Quality improvement (QI) initiatives have been shown to overcome some of these gaps. Computerised interventions, in particular, are potential enablers to improving system performance. However, implementation of these interventions into routine practice has resulted in mixed outcomes and those that have been successfully integrated into routine practice are difficult to sustain. The objective of this thesis is to understand how a multifaceted, computerised QI intervention for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and management was implemented in Australian general practices and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and assess the implications for scale-up of the intervention. The intervention was implemented as part of a large cluster-randomised controlled trial, the TORPEDO (Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk using Electronic Decision Support) study. The intervention was associated with improved guideline recommended cardiovascular risk factor screening rates but had mixed impact on improving medication prescribing rates. In this thesis, I designed a multimethod process and economic evaluation of the TORPEDO trial. The aims were to: i. Develop a theory-informed logic model to assist in the design of the overall evaluation to address study aims (Chapter 3). ii. Conduct a post-trial audit to quantify changes in cardiovascular risk factor screening and prescribing to high risk patients over an 18-month post-trial period and understand the impact of the intervention outside of a research trial setting (Chapter 4). vi iii. Use normalisation process theory to identify the underlying mechanisms by which the intervention did and did not have an impact on trial outcomes (Chapter 5). iv. Use video ethnography to explore how the intervention was used and cardiovascular risk communicated between patients and healthcare providers (Chapter 6). v. Conduct an economic evaluation to inform policy makers for delivering the intervention at scale through Primary Health Networks in New South Wales (Chapter 7). vi. Use a new theory to explain the factors that drove adoption and non-adoption of the intervention and assess what modifications may be needed to promote spread and scale-up (Chapter 8). I found variable outcomes during the post-trial period with a plateauing of improvements in guideline recommended screening practices but an ongoing improvement in prescribing to high risk patients. The group that continued to have the most benefit was patients at high CVD risk who were not receiving recommended medications at baseline. The delay in prescribing recommended medication suggests healthcare providers adopt a cautious approach when introducing new treatments. Six intervention primary healthcare services participated as case studies for the process evaluation. Qualitative and quantitative data sources were combined at each primary healthcare service to enable a detailed examination of intervention implementation from multiple perspectives. The process evaluation identified the complex interaction between several underlying mechanisms that influenced the implementation processes and explained the mixed trial outcomes: (1) organisational mission; (2) leadership; (3) the role of teams; (4) technical competence and dependability of the software tools. Further, there were different ‘active ingredients’ vii necessary during the initial implementation compared to those needed to sustain use of the intervention. In the video ethnography and post-consultation patient interviews, important insights were gained into how the intervention was used, and its interpretation by the doctor and patient. Through ethnographic accounts, the doctor’s communication of cardiovascular risk was not sufficient in engaging patients and having them act upon their high-risk status; effective communication required interactions be assessed, discussed and negotiated. The economic evaluation identified the cost implications of implementing the intervention as part of a Primary Health Network program in the state of New South Wales, Australia; and modelled data looked at the impact of small but statistically significant reductions in clinical risk factors based on the trial data. When scaled to a larger population the intervention has potential to prevent major CVD events at under AU$50,000 per CVD event averted largely due to the low costs of implementing the intervention. However, the clinical risk factor reductions were small and a stronger case for investment would be made if the effects sizes could be enhanced and sustained over time. The findings from chapters 4-6 provide insight into the intricacy of the barriers influencing implementation processes and adoption of the intervention. Taken together, these studies provide a detailed explanation of the processes that may be required to implement such an intervention at scale and the factors that might influence its impact and sustainability. The findings are expected to assist policy makers, administrators and health professionals in developing multiple interdependent QI strategies at the organisational, provider and consumer levels to improve primary healthcare system performance for cardiovascular disease management and prevention

Effects of antiplatelet therapy on stroke risk by brain imaging features of intracerebral haemorrhage and cerebral small vessel diseases: subgroup analyses of the RESTART randomised, open-label trial

Background Findings from the RESTART trial suggest that starting antiplatelet therapy might reduce the risk of recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage compared with avoiding antiplatelet therapy. Brain imaging features of intracerebral haemorrhage and cerebral small vessel diseases (such as cerebral microbleeds) are associated with greater risks of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. We did subgroup analyses of the RESTART trial to explore whether these brain imaging features modify the effects of antiplatelet therapy

Reasons for non-recruitment of eligible patients to a randomised controlled trial of secondary prevention after intracerebral haemorrhage: observational study.

Recruitment to randomised prevention trials is challenging, not least for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) associated with antithrombotic drug use. We investigated reasons for not recruiting apparently eligible patients at hospital sites that keep screening logs in the ongoing REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART), which seeks to determine whether to start antiplatelet drugs after ICH.EDGE project number 14013British Heart Foundation Special Project (SP/12/2/29422) & Project (PG/14/50/30891) fundin

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

Background: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. Methods: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). Findings: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29–146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0– 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25–1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39–1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65–1·60]; p=0·92). Interpretation: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

Background: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. Methods: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). Findings: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29–146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0– 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25–1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39–1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65–1·60]; p=0·92). Interpretation: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. METHODS: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29-146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0- 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25-1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39-1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65-1·60]; p=0·92). INTERPRETATION: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation

‘It’s just statistics … I’m kind of a glass half-full sort of guy’ : the challenge of differing doctor-patient perspectives in the context of electronically mediated cardiovascular risk management

Best practice guidelines for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease recommend that management decisions be informed by estimation of a patient’s ‘absolute risk’ of a cardiovascular event over time. Such a risk calculation is based on a combination of non-modifiable factors such as age and gender and modifiable factors that include blood pressure, lipids, diabetes, body mass index (BMI), tobacco smoking, alcohol use, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and psychosocial stress.19 page(s

Obesity enhances verbal memory in postmenopausal women with Down syndrome

Several lines of evidence suggest that the loss of estrogen after menopause may play a role in cognitive declines associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In postmenopausal women, the principal source of estrogen is estrone, which is influenced by body mass index (BMI). Increased BMI in postmenopausal women is associated with higher levels of serum estradiol and estrone. We hypothesized that obesity could have a beneficial effect on cognition with advancing age. We compared the performance of healthy nondemented obese and non-obese women with Down syndrome (DS) on a broad spectrum of cognitive tests. Estrone levels were 66.9% higher in obese than in non-obese postmenopausal women, and 136% higher in obese than in non-obese premenopausal women. Obese postmenopausal women performed significantly better than non-obese women on measures of verbal memory and on an omnibus test of neuropsychological function, but did not differ significantly in verbal fluency, language, praxis or visuospatial functioning. Among premenopausal women, there was no difference in cognitive function between obese and non-obese women. Our results support the hypothesis that higher endogenous estrogen levels after menopause are associated with better performance on verbal memory